Showing posts with label Startups & Entrepreneurship & Venture Capital & Seed Money & Angel Funding. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Startups & Entrepreneurship & Venture Capital & Seed Money & Angel Funding. Show all posts

Rdio - Music Streaming Product - 2015 Growth Failure story

In this post we will study "Rdio", which was a popular Music Streaming Product that failed miserably.

******* Choronology *******

2010 Aug
Rdio; the first modern music streaming service; was launched by Skype's founders Niklas Zennström and Janus Friis.
It had to compete with services such as Deezer, MOG, Napster, Rhapsody, and Spotify.
It offered a $5 web-only streaming plan (on the assumption you might not have a mobile device) and a BlackBerry app (in case you had a bad one).
Its catalog was limited to 7M songs, well short of the 30M tracks that it and its rivals now provide.


2013 Sep
Rdio added a music recommendations feature that delivered personalized albums, stations, and playlists.

2014 Jan
Rdio introduced some free streaming options, supported by audio advertisements.

2015 Nov
Rdio filed for bankruptcy.
Reached a deal to sell certain assets and intellectual property to a competitor, Pandora, for $75M.

2015 Dec
Rdio service was discontinued.

******* Experience *******

Using Rdio felt like the future.

Though, securing label deals took so long that the app was in development for two years before it launched, and it showed in the polished product delivered by its team.

Its blue-and-white design was calming.

Its simple grid of album artwork was a powerful rebuttal to iTunes’ nightmare spreadsheets.

It had innovative social features, showing you what your friends were streaming in real time.

It had a "heavy rotation" playlist that highlighted albums based on how many friends had listened to them.

"Social from the ground up — it sounds like marketing speak, but it was legit," said Chris Becherer, Rdio’s head of product. "The founding premise was the best music recommendations come from the people you know. That was the whole idea."

It got music people to explore and listen to more new+old music than they ever had before.
It always surfaced things people didn’t yet know they should be listening to.

Overall an excellent product.

******* Growth & Marketing *******

Early as it was to the United States, Rdio was born in the shadow of Spotify, a cunning and well-financed competitor that excelled at generating buzz — and using that buzz to acquire paid subscribers.

As streaming music became a playground for giants, Rdio turned to a terrestrial radio company in a last-ditch effort to grow the user base.

Ultimately, executives decided that Rdio’s only future lay in becoming part of an internet-based platform, even if it meant disassembling the service they had been building for more than five years.

Even in late 2010, when it began to spread among design-savvy early adopters in San Francisco, people were already talking about the coming launch of Spotify.
The Swedish streaming service wouldn’t launch in America for several months, but it quickly came to define online music in the popular imagination.
Its secret: free on-demand streaming, supported by advertising.
By contrast, Rdio required a paid subscription.

Rdio eventually developed a free tier, but it came long after Spotify launched in the United States.
More pressingly, the company struggled to make the case for its own unique service.

Rdio never had a dedicated marketing chief for more than a few months at a time.
Early on, the company contracted with West, a San Francisco-based agency run by Allison Johnson, Apple’s former head of marketing.
But many people inside the company blamed the lack of in-house marketers on its lack of traction. Later, Mark Ruxin, who joined Rdio after it acquired his app Tastemaker, served in the role.
But he only served in it for a few months before leaving.

By 2013, Spotify had rocketed to 24 million users, 6 million of whom paid.

Struggling to stand out, Rdio turned to Cumulus Media, which operated 525 terrestrial radio stations.

Cumulus took a large equity stake in the company; in return, its sales force began selling ads for Rdio, which enabled the company to finally offer the free, ad-supported version of the service that Spotify had been offering in various forms since 2008.

Cumulus also promised to promote Rdio on its popular stations.

But the resulting signups were apparently nothing to brag about.

******* Feature Prioritization *******

Rdio sometimes focused on the wrong things.

It invested many product cycles in refining its queue — a place to collect things you want to listen to later.

Every other music streaming service offers a queue that’s a simple list of tracks.

But if you dragged an album or a playlist into Rdio’s queue, Rdio would recognize it as a distinct object, so you could drag and drop an album above a track, or a full playlist below an album.

"That was not a major differentiating factor," says Wilson Miner (Design Head) "If we hadn’t had something like that, nobody would have noticed and it would have been fine. I still wish we could have solved it, but it was more of a personal quest than a brutally honest assessment of priorities."

******* Leadership & Radio-focus *******

Jun 2013, just before the Cumulus deal was announced, Rdio CEO Drew Larner announced he was stepping down.

Former employees say Larner was never totally comfortable being CEO; his expertise was in dealmaking, and he thought the company needed a leader whose talents lay in product and user growth.

Malthe Sigurdsson, its head of product and the person who oversaw its innovative design efforts, quit a month after Larner.

In Nov, Rdio laid off a third of its staff.

And while development on the core product continued, it increasingly felt radio-focused.

In August it added live radio stations to the app, a move designed to capitalize on the success of iHeartRadio, an app developed by the company formerly known as Clear Channel.

Earlier this month, Cumulus wrote down its investment in Rdio by $19 million.

******* Economics of Music *******

The economics of streaming music are brutal. Record labels have nearly all the leverage, and take most of the gross revenue from streaming services.

The only way to win is to achieve a massive scale — which is why Spotify has raised more than $1 billion, spending heavily to add subscribers in hopes they will lead to a sustainable business.

Rdio realized this only belatedly.

"Rdio, I guess, made the mistake of trying to be sustainable too early," Wilson Miner says. "That classic startup mistake of worrying about being profitable and having a business that makes any sense before you’ve reached this astronomical growth curve. Which is partly the trap of the business model itself. Because of the content licensing deals, the margins for the business were so incredibly thin. No matter what we did, the labels made the lion’s share of the revenue. You have to make it up with extreme volume, which is why you see Spotify going after every human being in the world."

And yet even with more than 75 million users and 20 million paid users, Spotify still isn’t profitable. It remains to be seen whether Apple or Google can turn their own streaming offerings into viable businesses — or whether they will simply use music as a loss leader to draw consumers further into their respective ecosystems, making the money back on hardware sales or other services.

******* Cause of Death *******

Multiple!
Marketing failure, Growth failure, and Leadership failure.

Niklas Zennström


Credits:
Linkedin.com/in/drew-larner-5b51bb34/
Linkedin.com/in/wilsonminer/
Linkedin.com/in/becherer/
Linkedin.com/in/malthe/
Linkedin.com/in/niklaszennstrom/
En.Wikipedia.org/wiki/Rdio
TheVerge.com/2015/11/17/9750890/rdio-shutdown-pandora

Wesabe - the 2010 FinTech Product Failure story

Wesabe was a personal finance company.

It analyzed a user's financial data to provide appropriate advice on how to save money.

Established in Dec 2005, it's site went live in Nov 2006, and they shut down in Jul 2010.

Received an approx $4M funding from Union Square Ventures and O'Reilly Alphatech Ventures.
Wesabe started generating revenue in late 2008, ran completely out of invested funds and survived solely on revenue almost 9 months before closing the company.

Marc Hedlund was the first person to start work on Wesabe and formally co-founded the company (as Chief Product Officer) with his high school friend, Jason Knight (CEO). 
Jason later left due to a family illness, Marc took over as CEO; without a formal peer; for the final two years.

When the company closed, Marc wrote a postmortem on the experience.
Following is a paraphrased; & improvised with images; version of his blogpost.

******** HISTORY ********

In Nov 2006, Wesabe launched as a site to help people manage their personal finances.

We certainly weren’t the first to try to tackle this problem through a web app, but we were the first of a new wave of companies that came out in the months that followed, characterized but what some would call a Web 2.0 approach to the problem.

Like Flickr and del.icio.us, we relied on community and features such as tags; unlike some of the previous attempts, we tried to automatically aggregate and store all of our users’ financial accounts on the web (instead of relying on manual data entry, say, or desktop storage of the data); and most especially, we tried to learn from the accumulated data our users uploaded, and make recommendations for better financial decisions based on that data.

If every copy of Quicken started out as a blank spreadsheet, Wesabe tried to accumulate knowledge from users and data that would fill in some of that spreadsheet for you, and point you in the direction of better choices.

Wesabe's website

Even before we launched, we heard about other people working on similar ideas, and a slew of companies soon launched in our wake.

None of them really seemed to get very far, though, and we were considered the leader in online personal finance until September 2007, when Mint launched at, and won, the first TechCrunch 40 conference.

From that point forward we were considered in second place at best, and they overshadowed our site and everyone else’s, too.

Two years later, Mint was acquired by Intuit, makers of Quicken (and after Mint’s launch, the makers of Quicken Online) for $170M.

Mint's website

I made nearly all of the product decisions myself, and was notorious with Jason and our board as being very hard-headed about those decisions.

While I relied on many other people in making product choices, I also hired and managed all of those people, so that group was at the least a reflection of who I thought had the right values and ideas.

******** FACTS ********

Wesabe launched about 10 months before Mint, but we didn’t capitalize on that early lead.

There’s a lot to be said for not rushing to market, and learning from the mistakes the first entrants make.
Shipping a MVP immediately and learning from the market directly makes good sense to me, but engaging with and supporting users is anything but free.

Observation can be cheaper.
Mint did well by seeing where we screwed up, and waiting to launch until they had a better approach.

Mint’s design was exceptional, but if other, stronger forms of lock-in are in place first, design alone can’t win a market, nor can it keep a market.

Neither of Mint nor Wesabe, bore any resemblance to a typical Silicon Valley success story, with traffic surging up and to the right (YouTube, Twitter, etc).
Mint aggressively acquired users by paying for search engine marketing (reportedly spending over $1 for each user), while Wesabe spent almost nothing on marketing; yet in the end we grew at about 1/5th the rate they did.
Their traffic dropped substantially for the 6 months after their acquisition, and has had sawtooth traffic after that.
Our patterns followed non-scalable curves (influenced primarily by press wins, economic conditions, and sometimes drafting on Mint’s coverage).

******** POSTMORTEM - A ********

We chose not to work with Yodlee, but failed to find or make a replacement for them (until too late).

Yodlee is a company that provides automatic financial data aggregation as a web service.
They screen-scrape bank web sites (that is, read the payee and amount and date by parsing them out of the bank’s web site, writing a custom parser for each bank they support).

When we talked to Yodlee in 2006, the company was crumbling, having failed to get acquired and losing executives.

They were also very aggressive in negotiation, telling us they would give us six months’ service nearly free and then tell us the final price we’d be charged going forward.

Since they had effectively no competitors, we didn’t believe we should tie our company to a single-source provider, especially one in very bad business shape.

Mint used Yodlee (at least until they were acquired - I’m not sure what they’re doing now) to automatically get user’s data from bank sites and import them into Mint, and as a result had a much easier user experience getting bank data imported.

Wesabe built our own data acquisition system, first using downloadable client programs (partially because that was easier and partially to preserve users’ privacy) and later using a Yodlee-like web interface, but the Yodlee-like version didn’t launch until six months after Mint went live, and even then didn’t really work as a near-complete replacement for some time after.

A good friend argues that our mistake was not using Yodlee in the first place, and maybe – probably – it was.

I believe, though, that we could have made that choice as long as we immediately assumed that someone else would eventually sign up with Yodlee, and that we had to be at least as good if not better than what Yodlee provided, however we got there.

PageOnce, for instance, has not used Yodlee, but has grown very significantly in the same time, using a combination of other aggregation methods that were more effective than ours.

Mint’s dependence on Yodlee apparently suppressed their acquisition interest among companies that knew Yodlee well (such as Microsoft, Yahoo, and Google); since we had developed our own technology for aggregation, we didn’t have that particular problem, and in fact had some acquisition interest simply for the aggregator we’d built.

We just didn’t build it nearly fast enough. 

******** POSTMORTEM - B ********

Mint focused on making the user do almost no work at all, by automatically editing and categorizing their data, reducing the number of fields in their signup form, and giving them immediate gratification as soon as they possibly could.
We completely sucked at all of that. 

Instead, I prioritized trying to build tools that would eventually help people change their financial behavior for the better, which I believed required people to more closely work with and understand their data.
My goals may have been noble, but in the end we didn’t help the people I wanted to since the product failed.
I was focused on trying to make the usability of editing data as easy and functional as it could be.

Mint was focused on making it so you never had to do that at all.
Their approach completely kicked our approach’s ass.

But their data accuracy; how well they automatically edited; was really low.
And anyone who looked deeply into their data at Mint, especially in the beginning, was shocked at how inaccurate it was.
The point, though, is hardly anyone seems to have looked.

Between the worse data aggregation method and the much higher amount of work Wesabe made you do, it was far easier to have a good experience on Mint, and that good experience came far more quickly.

******** CRUX ********

1.
That one mistake (not using or replacing Yodlee before Mint had a chance to launch on Yodlee) was probably enough to kill Wesabe alone.

2.
Everything I’ve mentioned – not being dependent on a single source provider, preserving users’ privacy, helping users actually make positive change in their financial lives – all of those things are great, rational reasons to pursue what we pursued. 
But none of them matter if the product is harder to use, since most people simply won’t care enough or get enough benefit from long-term features if a shorter-term alternative is available.


3.
A domain name doesn’t win you a market.
Launching second or fifth or tenth doesn’t lose you a market.
You can’t blame your competitors or your board or the lack of or excess of investment.

4.
Focus on what really matters: Making users happy with your product as quickly as you can, and helping them as much as you can after that. 
If you do those better than anyone else out there you’ll win.
I think in this case, Mint totally won at the first (making users happy quickly), and we both totally failed at the second (actually helping people).
No one, in my view, solved the financial problems of consumers - No one even got close.
Yes, both products helped some people – ours mostly through a supportive community and theirs mostly through giving people a rough picture of where their money has gone.

5.
But when we analyzed the benefits we saw for our users, and when Mint boasted about the benefits they saw for their users, the debt reduction and savings increase numbers directly matched the national averages.
Because our products existed during a deep financial crisis, consumers everywhere cut back, saved more, and tried to reduce their debt.
Neither product had any significant impact beyond what the overall economy led people to do anyways.

6.
Changing people’s behavior is really hard. 
No one in this market succeeded at doing so – there is no Google nor Amazon of personal finance. 

Marc Hedlund


Credits:
Linkedin.com/in/precipice/
En.Wikipedia.org/wiki/Wesabe
Blog.Precipice.org/why-wesabe-lost-to-mint/
TheSmarterWallet.com/2009/wesabe-review-free-online-money-management-tool/

30 Indian Statups became Unicorns in last 10 years

All of these are Tech companies & 4 of these are listed:

MakeMyTrip
InMobi
Flipkart
JustDial
MuSigma
Snapdeal
Naukri
Ola
Quikr
Hike
PayTm
Zoho
ShopClues
Byjus
PayTmMall
InfiBeam
Oyo
Swiggy
Rivigo
PineLabs
Zomato
FreshWorks
PolicyBazaar
Udaan
PhonePe
BillDesk
BigBasket
Dream11
BlackBuck
DelhiVery


Credit:
https://www.linkedin.com/company/2824458/

using Robotics & Automation to convert Garbage into Money

What is Impossible?
Cleaning 1,000,000 Tons of Garbage in 200 Days from 100 Acres of land & also Generate Revenue while doing so - Is this even remotely possible?

'Impossible is Nothing' & this man has proven it without a doubt - Asheesh Singh (IAS, Municipal Commissioner, Indore, M.P., India).

the Story:
1. Indore became 100% Garbage-free & India's cleanest city
2. Cleared 1.3 Million Metric Tons of garbage (dumped in last 45 years)
3. From 100 Acres of land
4. Done in just 6 months
5. Used Robotics & Automation & Software-based-monitoring
6. Generated Methane & Compost from Wet-waste (revenue generation)
7. Segregated Dry-waste in ~30 categories & sells the same further (revenue generation)
8. Generated Diesel from Plastic (revenue generation)
9. Of the 100 Acres of reclaimed land, 10 Acres being used to build a Forest
10. Part of #SwachhBharatMission led by India's PM #NarendraModi

#WasteManagement #WasteDisposal #Waste2Energy #WasteToEnergy #WasteRecycling

Credit:

Best Online Communities & Groups for UX & Product & Business discussions - Facebook groups

Mixergy Premium
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1748351532109686/

Hackathon Hackers
https://www.facebook.com/groups/hackathonhackers/

Bots
https://www.facebook.com/groups/chatbot/

The Startup Chat Mastermind Group
https://www.facebook.com/groups/TheStartupChat/

The Product Group
https://www.facebook.com/groups/theproductgroup/

HH Product Management
https://www.facebook.com/groups/hhProductManagement/

The 7 Day Startup
https://www.facebook.com/groups/592264044218722/

London Statups
https://www.facebook.com/groups/LDNstartups/

the Funding-application that Drew Houston submitted for his Startup Dropbox to Silicon-valley's Startup-incubator Y-Combinator in 2007

In 2007, an MIT graduate named Drew Houston was trying to get his startup, Dropbox, off the ground. He was trying to get Y Combinator to invest in his file storing and sharing startup.

Y Combinator is one of Silicon Valley's premiere startup incubator programs, offering early-stage companies some of their first investment funding, and access to mentors and experts.

Here's the application Houston submitted to Y Combinator's Paul Graham back then.
_________________________________________________________

From Dropbox:

Y Combinator Funding Application
Summer 2007
Application deadline: 12 midnight (PST) April 2, 2007.

Please try to answer each question in less than 120 words.

We look at online demos only for the most promising applications, so don't skimp on the application because you're relying on a good demo.

We don't make any formal promise about secrecy, but we don't plan to let anyone outside Y Combinator see these applications, including other startups we fund.

We recommend you save regularly by clicking on the update button at the bottom of this page. Otherwise you may lose work if we restart the server. 

# Username: 
dhouston

# Company name: 
Dropbox

# Company url, if any: 
http://www.getdropbox.com/

# Phone number (preferably cell): 
[Redacted]

# Usernames of all founders, separated by spaces. (Please have all founders create YC accounts, or create accounts for them.) 
dhouston

# Usernames of all founders who will move to (or already live in) Boston for the summer if we fund you. 
dhouston

# What is your company going to make? 
Dropbox synchronizes files across your/your team's computers. It's much better than uploading or email, because it's automatic, integrated into Windows, and fits into the way you already work. There's also a web interface, and the files are securely backed up to Amazon S3. Dropbox is kind of like taking the best elements of subversion, trac and rsync and making them "just work" for the average individual or team. Hackers have access to these tools, but normal people don't.

There are lots of interesting possible features. One is syncing Google Docs/Spreadsheets (or other office web apps) to local .doc and .xls files for offline access, which would be strategically important as few web apps deal with the offline problem.

# For each founder, please list: YC username; name; age; year, school, degree, and subject for each degree; email address; personal url (if any); and present employer and title (if any). Put unfinished degrees in parens. List the main contact first. Separate founders with blank lines. Put an asterisk before the name of anyone not able to move to Boston for the summer. 
dhouston; Drew Houston; 24; 2006, MIT, SB computer science; houston AT alum DOT (school i went to) DOT edu; --; Bit9, Inc (went full time to part time 1/07) - project lead/software engineer

Although I'm working with other people on Dropbox, strictly speaking I'm the only founder right now. My friend [redacted], a great hacker, Stanford grad and creator of [redacted] is putting together a Mac port, but can't join as a founder right now as a former cofounder of his started an extremely similar company. My friend and roommate i from MIT is helping out too, but he works with me at Bit9, and a non-solicit clause in my employment contract prevents me from recruiting him (and the VP Eng explicitly told me not to recruit him.)

In any case, I have several leads, have been networking aggressively, and fully intend to get someone else on board -- either another good hacker or a more sales-oriented guy (e.g. the role Matt fills at Xobni). I'm aware that the odds aren't good for single founders, and would rather work with other people anyway.


# Please tell us in one or two sentences something about each founder that shows a high level of ability. 
Drew - Programming since age 5; startups since age 14; 1600 on SAT; started profitable online SAT prep company in college (accoladeprep.com). For fun last summer reverse engineered the software on a number of poker sites and wrote a real-money playing poker bot (it was about break-even; see screenshot url later in the app.)

# What's new about what you're doing? 
Most small teams have a few basic needs: (1) team members need their important stuff in front of them wherever they are, (2) everyone needs to be working on the latest version of a given document (and ideally can track what's changed), (3) and team data needs to be protected from disaster. There are sync tools (e.g. beinsync, Foldershare), there are backup tools (Carbonite, Mozy), and there are web uploading/publishing tools (box.net, etc.), but there's no good integrated solution.

Dropbox solves all these needs, and doesn't need configuration or babysitting. Put another way, it takes concepts that are proven winners from the dev community (version control, changelogs/trac, rsync, etc.) and puts them in a package that my little sister can figure out (she uses Dropbox to keep track of her high school term papers, and doesn't need to burn CDs or carry USB sticks anymore.)

At a higher level, online storage and local disks are big and cheap. But the internet links in between have been and will continue to be slow in comparison. In "the future", you won't have to move your data around manually. The concept that I'm most excited about is that the core technology in Dropbox -- continuous efficient sync with compression and binary diffs -- is what will get us there.

# What do you understand about your business that other companies in it just don't get? 
Competing products work at the wrong layer of abstraction and/or force the user to constantly think and do things. The "online disk drive" abstraction sucks, because you can't work offline and the OS support is extremely brittle. Anything that depends on manual emailing/uploading (i.e. anything web-based) is a non-starter, because it's basically doing version control in your head. But virtually all competing services involve one or the other.

With Dropbox, you hit "Save", as you normally would, and everything just works, even with large files (thanks to binary diffs).

# What are people forced to do now because what you plan to make doesn't exist yet? 
Email themselves attachments. Upload stuff to online storage sites or use online drives like Xdrive, which don't work on planes. Carry around USB drives, which can be lost, stolen, or break/get bad sectors. Waste time revising the wrong versions of given documents, resulting in Frankendocuments that contain some changes but lose others. My friend Reuben is switching his financial consulting company from a PHP-based CMS to a beta of Dropbox because all they used it for was file sharing. Techies often hack together brittle solutions involving web hosting, rsync, and cron jobs, or entertaining abominations such as those listed in this slashdot article ("Small Office Windows Backup Software" - http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/01/04/0336246).

# How will you make money? 
The current plan is a freemium approach, where we give away free 1GB accounts and charge for additional storage (maybe ~$5/mo or less for 10GB for individuals and team plans that start at maybe $20/mo.). It's hard to get consumers to pay for things, but fortunately small/medium businesses already pay for solutions that are subsets of what Dropbox does and are harder to use. There will be tiered pricing for business accounts (upper tiers will retain more older versions of documents, have branded extranets for secure file sharing with clients/partners, etc., and an 'enterprise' plan that features, well, a really high price.)

I've already been approached by potential partners/customers asking for an API to programmatically create Dropboxes (e.g. to handle file sharing for Assembla.com, a web site for managing global dev teams). There's a natural synergy between Basecamp-like project mgmt/groupware web apps (for the to-do lists, calendaring, etc.) and Dropbox for file sharing. I've also had requests for an enterprise version that would sit on a company's network (as opposed to my S3 store) for which I could probably charge a lot.

# Who are your competitors, and who might become competitors? Who do you fear most? 
Carbonite and Mozy do a good job with hassle-free backup, and a move into sync would make sense. Sharpcast (venture funded) announced a similar app called Hummingbird, but according to [redacted] they're taking an extraordinarily difficult approach involving NT kernel drivers. Google's coming out with GDrive at some point. Microsoft's Groove does sync and is part of Office 2007, but is very heavyweight and doesn't include any of the web stuff or backup. There are apps like Omnidrive and Titanize but the implementations are buggy or have bad UIs.

# For founders who are hackers: what cool things have you built? (Include urls if possible.) 
Accolade Online SAT prep (launched in 2004) (http://www.accoladeprep.com/); a poker bot (here's an old screenshot: https://www.accoladeprep.com/sshot2.gif; it's using play money there but worked with real money too.)

# How long have the founders known one another and how did you meet? 
There's a joke in here somewhere.

# What tools will you use to build your product? 
Python (top to bottom.) sqlite (client), mysql (server). Turbogears (at least until it won't scale.) Amazon EC2 and S3 for serving file data.

# If you've already started working on it, how long have you been working and how many lines of code (if applicable) have you written? 
3 months part time. About ~5KLOC client and ~2KLOC server of python, C++, Cheetah templates, installer scripts, etc.

# If you have an online demo, what's the url?
Here's a screencast that I'll also put up on news.yc:
http://www.getdropbox.com/u/2/screencast%20-%20Copy.html
If you do have a Windows box or two, here's the latest build:
http://www.getdropbox.com/u/2/DropboxInstaller.exe

# How long will it take before you have a prototype? A beta? A version you can charge for? 
Prototype - done in Feb. Version I can charge for: 8 weeks maybe? (ed: hahaha)

# Which companies would be most likely to buy you? 
Google/MS/Yahoo are all acutely interested in this general space. Google announced GDrive/"Platypus" a long time ago but the release date is uncertain (a friend at Google says the first implementation was this ghetto VBScript/Java thing for internal use only). MS announced Live Drive and bought Foldershare in '05 which does a subset of what Dropbox does. Iron Mountain, Carbonite or Mozy or anyone else dealing with backup for SMBs could also be interested, as none of them have touched the sync problem to date.

In some ways, Dropbox is for arbitrary files what Basecamp is for lightweight project management, and the two would plug together really well (although 37signals doesn't seem like the buying-companies type).

At the end of the day, though, it's an extremely capital-efficient business. We know people are willing to pay for this and just want to put together something that rocks and get it in front of as many people as possible.

# If one wanted to buy you three months in (August 2007), what's the lowest offer you'd take? 
I'd rather see the idea through, but I'd probably have a hard time turning down $1m after taxes for 6 months of work.

# Why would your project be hard for someone else to duplicate? 
This idea requires executing well in several somewhat orthogonal directions, and missteps in any torpedo the entire product.

For example, there's an academic/theoretical component: designing the protocol and app to behave consistently/recoverably when any power or ethernet cord in the chain could pop out at any time. There's a gross Win32 integration piece (ditto for a Mac port). There's a mostly Linux/Unix-oriented operations/sysadmin and scalability piece. Then there's the web design and UX piece to make things simple and sexy. Most of these hats are pretty different, and if executing in all these directions was easy, a good product/service would already exist.

# Do you have any ideas you consider patentable? 
[Redacted]

# What might go wrong? (This is a test of imagination, not confidence.) 
Google might finally unleash GDrive and steal a lot of Dropbox's thunder (especially if this takes place before launch.) In general, the online storage space is extremely noisy, so being marginally better isn't good enough; there has to be a leap in value worthy of writing/blogging/telling friends about. I'll need to bring on cofounder(s) and build a team, which takes time. Other competitors are much better funded; we might need to raise working capital to accelerate growth. There will be the usual growing pains scaling and finding bottlenecks (although I've provisioned load balanced, high availability web apps before.) Acquiring small business customers might be more expensive/take longer than hoped. Prioritizing features and choosing the right market segments to tackle will be hard. Getting love from early adopters will be important, but getting distracted by/releasing late due to frivolous feature requests could be fatal.

# If you're already incorporated, when were you? Who are the shareholders and what percent does each own? If you've had funding, how much, at what valuation(s)? 
Not incorporated

# If you're not incorporated yet, please list the percent of the company you plan to give each founder, and anyone else you plan to give stock to. (This question is as much for you as us.) 
Drew

# If you'll have any major expenses beyond the living costs of your founders, bandwidth, and servers, what will they be? 
None; maybe AdWords.

# If by August your startup seems to have a significant (say 20%) chance of making you rich, which of the founders would commit to working on it full-time for the next several years? 
Drew

# Do any founders have other commitments between June and August 2007 inclusive? 
No; I've given notice at Bit9 to work on this full time regardless of YC funding.

# Do any founders have commitments in the future (e.g. have been accepted to grad school), and if so what? 
No. Probably moving to SF in September

# Are any of the founders covered by noncompetes or intellectual property agreements that overlap with your project? Will any be working as employees or consultants for anyone else? 
Drew: Some work was done at the Bit9 office; I consulted an attorney and have a signed letter indicating Bit9 has no stake/ownership of any kind in Dropbox

# Was any of your code written by someone who is not one of your founders? If so, how can you safely use it? (Open source is ok of course.) 
No

# If you had any other ideas you considered applying with, feel free to list them. One may be something we've been waiting for. 
One click screen sharing (already done pretty well by Glance); a wiki with version-controlled drawing canvases that let you draw diagrams or mock up UIs (Thinkature is kind of related, but this is more text with canvases interspersed than a shared whiteboard) to help teams get on the same page and spec things out better (we use Visio and Powerpoint at Bit9, which sucks)

# Please tell us something surprising or amusing that one of you has discovered. (The answer need not be related to your project.) 
The ridiculous things people name their documents to do versioning, like "proposal v2 good revised NEW 11-15-06.doc", continue to crack me up.
_________________________________________________________

Dropbox co-founders Drew Houston and Arash Ferdowsi celebrated the event of Dropbox's IPO at the NASDAQ in New York City on 2018 March 23rd. Dropbox is finally public & worth $20B

Sources:
Thisisinsider.com/video-dropbox-ceo-drew-houston-ipo-interview-2018-3
Businessinsider.in/dropbox-just-went-public-and-is-now-worth-20-billion-now-read-the-ceos-application-for-its-first-round-of-funding/articleshow/63445296.cms

story of 2017 Indian Startup ecosystem

1. 1000+ new start-ups added (7% YoY growth)

2. 35% Mortality rate

3. 50%+ of new start-ups were in B2B segment with Fintech & Healthtech leading the pack

4. IoT, AR (augmented reality), Blockchain emerged as new sectors followed by Robotics & 3D Printing (with Logistics, Agri tech, SaaS sectors emerging in Tier II & III cities)

5. Bengaluru, NCR, Mumbai were major hubs

6. Tier II & III cities accounted for 20% of start-ups

7. 18% YoY growth in Social start-ups

8. Total amount of funding increased

9. Funding surged from 27% to 32% in B2B sector

10. Unicorns' funding rose to $6.4B

11. 53% dip in Seed-stage funding

12. Funding for start-ups that were founded in the last 5 years slipped from $2B to $1.8B

13. 30% increase in Accelerators

14. Non-US investors started to foray into India

15. Number of mergers/acquisitions rose, with many non-tech Indian companies acquiring start-ups

16. Indian government’s (NaMo's) continued its constant push towards creating a conducive startup environment via initiatives like 'Startup India', 'Standup India', 'Digital India'. Government also eased policies around running-businesses - better taxation policies implemented, easier methods to start up, greater access to loans, scaled-up support to establishing incubation centers. Government floated 50+ sector-specific & sector-agnostic schemes including Single Point Registration Scheme (SPRS), Bank Credit Facilitation SchemePradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana (PMMY), etc. It also amended the new General Financial Rules, where it will give priority to products from Indian startups in official procurement.

17. 72% founders were less than 35 years old

18. Demonetization & GST fueled FinTech's growth

19. India ranked:
3rd largest start-up market, only after USA & UK
60th in Global Innovation index
2nd in Global Fintech-adoption index
5th in solving social issues with innovation
3rd in number of Startup Incubators/Accelerators, after China & USA



Source:
Entrepreneur.com/article/304078
Yourstory.com/2017/12/challenges-achievements-indian-startup-ecosystem-2017/

every 'Product Manager' & 'Entrepreneur' should first become 'Problem Sherlock'

1 question that all Wantrepreneurs, Product Managers/Owners, & budding Entrepreneurs often have/ask is:
Are there still more new ideas like Facebook, Google, Uber, Amazon, Airbnb, eBay, etc.?

The answer is 'Yes'a mammoth YES!!!

An idea is nothing but a Problem-solving-Product (notice the fact that 'Problem' comes before 'Product').

And the good news is that there are; and always will-be; trillions of problems waiting to be solved.

Though almost all problems look trivial/silly in the eyes of a normal person, they have the pottential to be turned into the next Facebook, Google, Uber, Amazon, Airbnb, eBay, etc.

To give you a bit perspective on what I just said, consider this:
  1. In 2004, if you asked any normal person about having a site to connect to friends and post photos, they might have been quite unexcited about the idea.
  2. In 1998, if you asked any normal person what would be the value of a company that does only search, they might have said a max of $1M - As a matter of fact, the Google founders themselves were willing to sell for such a small amount.
Point is, no company at the start ever looks like Google/Facebook/etc. in their present corporate form.

So what should be your steps towards building a Product?
  1. Be a 'Problem Sherlock' - Keep looking for problems waiting to be solved - Lets say, if you are starting a healthcare startup, you should spend 4-6 months in a large scale healthcare system. Shadow doctors each day. Have lunch with the nurses. Go for drinks with the CMOs and CIOs. Basically breathe and live the life of a healthcare system from a patient perspective, from a doctor’s perspective, and from an administrator’s perspective. And when you do all of that, you start seeing the problems in the system.
  2. Make a list of problems that you want to attack - Pick up the problem that some business needs or where someone would pay you money - This is your 'the Problem'.
  3. Don’t worry too much about how big that problem is.
  4. Don’t worry too much about how big the market is.
  5. Nobody - none of the investors or experts - ever had a clue of how big Microsoft, Apple, Google or Amazon was going to become.
  6. Avoid the need to go to an investor.
  7. Come up with solutions for it.
  8. Talk to your users/consumers to know if what you think/theorize will work.
  9. Build a Product around the solution.
  10. As you get sustainable, you will find a way to build a much bigger idea and get clarity on the market.

Summary is:
As a Product Owner or Entrepreneur it is your duty to unearth, find, discover, decode, understand a good problem and then work on solutioning it to ultimately build a product that can generate money for you.
The 'Problem' is the key/starting Point and you need to ensure that you make it not just right but also Perfect.
So, be a 'Problem Sherlock' and go search your 'the Problem'...


The word 'Problem Sherlock' is a copyrighted © property of the Owner of this blog.
Reproduction in any form or medium without the written permission of the owner is strictly prohibited by law.



Source:
Mostly copied from Balaji's answer on Quora
inc42.com/features/punit-soni-ama-healthtech-robin/

A Startup versus A Project

I created multiple Startups in last 1 year and Quit them without making Money.
Is it possible? 
Hell No! 
All what I had done was creating multiple Projects. 

Startup is a different ballgame altogether.

One of the biggest Mistakes Entrepreneurs makes is Quitting way too early.
As a Startup Entrepreneur, you are fighting against all odds.
You are picking up Ideas that have been rejected by Smart people at large Companies.
You are trying to build Products that the Customers don’t even know they need.
To succeed in that game you have to hole in and play the war.
You have to hole-in so deep that your adversary - even a Superpower - gets tired and gives up.

AND You need to stick long! Why?
The longer you stay, more achievements you can make and more seriously you will be taken by the players around. You will build more deeper expertise, connections, & brand. Thus, the biggest goal of a startup should be to stick long in an idea.

And for that to happen you should:
1. Find the most desperate customer who wants the solution and sell it to them. Fixing their problem is the key to survive. Later you can fix much more sexier markets.
2. Put all out emphasis on Cashflow - be fanatic about it. If you have the cashflow, Investors would come knocking. The only time investors would come knocking is when you don’t need them.
3. Be a penny-pincher. Even after you get the investment. Especially after you get the investment. The greatest entrepreneurs are those who greatly conserved other people’s money. That will improve your odds of Survival.
4. Shut out all kinds of Distraction and second doubts about your idea. Almost any idea can be Scaled or Morphed to become Monstrous. It is your Execution that counts. And if you become a great Executor you can always change your idea years from know.
5. Team with People who are in it for the long term. If you cannot stand them for more than a few weeks, you should not have started with them.

Only if you do the above 5 and Survive at least 1 year and generate Revenues from customers, you are a Startup - Until then, you are just building Projects.


Source:
This post has been copied from an answer written by Balaji on Quora

key Events & Lessons from Indian Startup ecosystem of 2016

  1. Unicorns realised that they were just a paper-corns. Most of them are challenged by their global counterparts.
  2. We have 2 India - Digital (one that deals online) and Analog (one that deals in cash)
  3. Funding is down by almost 50%. Unicorns are struggling - but that’s a good sign. There was too much of easy money.
  4. Bootstrapping is still underrated.
  5. There are 2 faces investors have these days - One on twitter (where they talk a lot of sense) and another one is the real face where they are still investing in karts/apps. Which one to believe?
  6. Tiger and Softbank exit from India has sent the wrong signals to the world.
  7. Balance of Power has shifted to investors. It was with startups till 2015, but now investors are calling it a shot.
  8. Edutech is hot. Thanks to Byju’s. For others, it’s business as usual.
  9. Foodtech is over. Suddenly, investors realised that there was actually no tech in foodtech and all the 2014-15 money just went down the shithole.
  10. Healthtech is as hot as 2010.
  11. Fintech is either Payment wallet or Lending. It will be a lot more than this.
  12. Startups went back on promises made to employees who were laid off for no fault of theirs.
  13. Trusting startups has become tough - as a customer, as a candidate and even as a partner.
  14. Startup journalism is the new swag.
  15. Startup journalism is pretty much over. It’s either about sucking up (all good stories) or bringing startups down. No perspective building. No questions being asked.
  16. There is a rush among startup and tech journos to explore future or explore the past (numbers, predictions, heck-i-told-you moment), but nobody wants to look at the present and ask tough questions.
  17. Hiring is down. This has made it comparatively easy for not-so-well-funded startups to hire good talent.
  18. Great employees are bored. Totally!!!
  19. Nothing exciting is happening at unicorns and similar companies. The biggest beneficiary? Well funded not-of-Indian-origin companies who are poaching these fellas.
  20. There are vey very few new sexy business ideas right now in the ecosystem.
  21. As an ecosystem, we have taken ourselves too seriously. Everybody is too serious. There is very little fun left.
  22. Very few startups are solving hard problems.
  23. Very few investors are even interested in startups that are solving hard problems.
  24. Traction metrics have gotten tough now. Earlier it used to be downloads, pageviews etc.
  25. Indian ecosystem has more startup events than the number of serious startups.
  26. India had more startup awards than startups exits.
  27. Most startups exits were acquihires.
  28. Investors are selling off their portfolio companies to each other.
  29. Hackathons are dead. They are hireathons now.
  30. Local language is super hot. Just that we don’t have enough founders taking a shot at it.
  31. Bots - Nobody knows what it is. But everyone wants to build/invest in one. It’s the new sexy/hot/trending phenomena.
  32. Clearly, product management is not a thing among Indian startups.
  33. Growth hacking = SEO etc, but not product thinking.
  34. Indian founders learnt all the wrong things from China and Silicon Valley. Hustling from China and fund raising smarts from Silicon Valley. Frankly, China is about deeper consumer behaviour understanding and SV is a lot about growth hacking/scale thinking.
  35. Top industries facing the impact of slowdown in startup space are : PR firms, Interior designers, Hiring consultants, print/TV media.
  36. In 2015, several funds and mafia houses came up with a formula to run a startup and make some serious quick money. Thankfully, the markets don’t care and all these stories are over now.
Source:
https://www.nextbigwhat.com/indian-startup-ecosystem-2016-297/

Entrepreneurship, Startups, Abrtact Minimum Viable Products

Entrepreneurship in a Lean Startup is a series of MVPs (Minimum Viable Products).

Can MVPs b abstract?

Yes!

Examples:



Source:
http://venturehacks.com/articles/minimum-viable-product-examples

Indian Startups that Shut down in 2016

Here is a list of some of these startups who failed and forced to shut down operations:



A few more:






My tweet on this topic:

Source:
https://yourstory.com/2016/07/startup-shutdowns-2015-2016/
http://www.indianweb2.com/2016/08/25/20-indian-startups-shutdown-in-2016/